Is the“MUMTAZ” of ‘DILLI’ a less survive

            Sensual love_gamble_mourning –in a comparative mode  

It is hesitation nowhere what is the relation between mumtaz and thesunada, obviously not except some deciphers may or may not underlined. Whatever the evidences are marshalling scrupulously about the perfect love some ambiguity will exists and people will squint in it.

                                                            Some basic things the calligraphy equates is if we remember about shahanshaz then dilli will comes in mind at first. If you take history there is a gracious one in all time that is ‘the world is ruled by the men in all time and women get its benefits and benevolence.’ This is repeat and refurbished in many ways.

If we remember the history then mogul epoch will come in to the mind and Shah Jahan also, and if we remember Shah Jahan,Mumtaz will come in to the picture via Taj Mahal as souvenir. Like that if we remember about the congress rule in Dilli,the HRD minister must came in pic  (not for his peonies ideas to humanity) and his wife via IPL as souvenir, both for their sensual love. Both in the history cynosure is the Dilli even if they are not at all cherished leaders but people remember without hideous that is also an embarrassment. And think beyond the ken the life of Shah Jahan after Mumtaz is of perilous oddity, his crore property is insubstantial for his last decades of life and he abashed a lot.

            This is written because not to impress but to show Indians are in a comparative mode they compare the conditions to the past even it is jp movement, Anna’s Anshan or tragedy in Dili ..Whatever be they looks in a comparative mode not in superlative. Let the apparent time in Dili for superlative mode  the waves are showing like that to affirm our stark pave ANARCHY of past.